Intro
by
Alex Lightman, Publisher
|
|
I would like to remind everyone to mark your calendars
now for the Coalition Summit for IPv6 2006
(www.coalitionsummit.com)
to be held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands
from October 3rd - 5th. The event
is being produced in cooperation with NATO, and promises
to be an enlightening view into the transformation
initiatives being taken by US and allied military
and homeland defense organizations, IT companies and
R&D centers. Featured speakers will include Maj.
General Dennis Moran of the Office of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gerard Segarra
the Manager of the Telematics Research Unit for Renault/Nissan
and Ulf Dahlston, a director the
European Commission. In addition, there will be a
top notch line-up of military and industry IT leaders
talking about what benefits IPv6 can bring to net-centric
warfare, joint interoperability and multimedia convergence.
You will get an intimate view of the global IPv6 landscape
in the US, Europe and Asia, and have the opportunity
to meet senior thought leaders, potential customers,
and strategic partners. Other upcoming events include
our Asia Summit for IPv6 in Manila,
(www.asiaipv6.com)
being held on November 7th - 8th
and our US Summit for IPv6 in Reston, VA,
March 26th - 29th. Visit www.usipv6.com
for further details and read our featured article
in this edition.
This month's 6Sense presents a broad and
dynamic range of positions in the IPv6 universe. We
begin with a great article by Stan Barber,
VP of Engineering Operations of NTT communications
on Transitioning a WAN to IPv6. In it, he
outlines the principles for taking an existing IPv4
corporate network and integrating IPv6 capabilities
into it. He further details both operational and architectural
requirements to successfully enhance a network to
be both IPv4 and IPv6 enabled. On the global front,
we have Chris Harz, VP of Strategic
Planning for IPv6 Summit, Inc., giving a breakdown
of the recent EU Expert Conference on IPv6 in Vienna,
Austria. The event, entitled Convergence: New
Opportunities for Accelerating the IPv6 Momentum,
covered a wide range of topics, from European IPv6
adoption policies to planned innovations for EuroControl
– an organization that manages Air Traffic control
in Europe – using VoIP via IPv6 in sectors of
air space. Harz's report centers on the business
of technology and how Europe and Asia are moving forward
to create substantial infrastructure, but are in great
need of clear business models and revenue generating
applications. Lawrence Hughes, the
Chairman and CTO of InfoWeapons, gives us a savvy
yet accessible explication of the auto-configuration
functionality of IPv6, with an explanation of configuration
tools like DHCPv4 and how it can be modified and used
in IPv6 networks. Finally, Alan Rosenberg
from Global Crossing presents an informative case
study illustrating a provider's migration to
IPv6 and the benefits of developing v6 capabilities
in advance of market demand and applications.
We would also like to invite our 6Sense readers to
send us their own articles in areas of IPv6 that interest
them, especially IPTV, Sensornets, RFID tracking for
SCM (Supply Chain Management) and CRM (Customer Relations
Management), Emergency Medical Response, E-Learning,
and Situation Assessment for first responders. Please
contact newsletter@usipv6.com
with any questions. We look forward to your submissions.
Respectfully,

Alex Lightman
Publisher, 6Sense Newsletter
CEO, Innofone.com, Inc.
"The largest and fastest growing IPv6 pure-play"
|
IPv6 Auto Configuration
By
Lawrence E. Hughes
CTO, InfoWeapons Corporation
|
|
One of the major advantages of IPv6 over IPv4 is
its ability to automate configuration of parameters
related to network connectivity of client nodes (network
enabled devices such as PCs, PDAs, or printers). With
IPv4, when you connect a client node to a TCP/IP based
network, there is a fairly complex process required
to set things such as the IP address, the netmask,
the default gateway and the location of DNS servers.
The person configuring these things must have a fairly
good understanding of network concepts, including
addressing and subnets, in addition to specific details
of the network to which the node will be connected.
Getting any of this information wrong (say using a
subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 when the correct subnet
mask is 255.0.0.0) can prevent the connection from
working at all, or provide limited or intermittent
connectivity. In earlier days, network devices were
typically installed within organizations that could
afford a network specialist with an adequate working
knowledge of the necessary technology. Even so, costs
associated with such expert based manual configuration
were significant.
Many IPv4 networks use a simple auto configuration
tool called DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol),
or DHCPv4 to be more precise, originally defined in
RFC 1531 in October 1993, making it a fairly mature
Internet standard. The most recent version of the
standard is RFC 2131 (March 1997). There have been
many RFCs written to extend DHCPv4 in various ways,
and it is very widely implemented and used. DHCPv4
solves many of the problems associated with node configuration,
but is highly specific to IPv4 in many ways. There
are a number of good books on DHCPv4, which cover
all the relevant concepts for UNIX and/or Windows.
My personal favorite, which covers both platforms,
is "DHCP Handbook (2nd Edition)," Ralph Droms and
Ted Lemon, Sams Publishing, October 2002.
READ
ENTIRE ARTICLE
|
Upcoming v6 Summits: Three Important Events
By
Christopher Harz
VP, IPv6 Summit, Inc.
|
|
In order to help you plan your calendars somewhat
in advance, we thought it might be beneficial to let
you know about our three next IPv6 Summits –
where and when they are, and what they're about.
The Coalition Summit for IPv6
takes place from 3-5 October in Amsterdam, the Netherlands,
in cooperation with NATO (which just happens to have
its headquarters units almost right next door). A
major objective of this event is to bring together
top thought leaders and decision makers from NATO,
the EU, the US and its allies, and share the status
and trends of IPv6 implementation in military, government
and business IT organizations in the represented countries.
A second major mission is to identify major IPv6
initiatives that are evolving into substantive applications
that will be useful to a wide audience -- and profitable
or expedient for telcos, ISPs and other vendors. Several
recent international IPv6 conferences have posed this
question more bluntly, as "Where are the distinctive
apps?" (applications that can't be handled
in the short term with v4), or simply, "Show
us the money!" Whereas such applications have
obvious interest for the civilian community, they
also have import for government IT organizations –
it is the stated intent of NATO, for instance, to
make maximum use of IPv6 COTS (Commercial Off The
Shelf) applications. That makes it useful to see what
those COTS applications are likely to be, in the near
future.
READ
ENTIRE ARTICLE
|
|
Transitioning a WAN to IPv6
By Stan Barber
Vice President, Engineering Operations
Global IP Network
NTT Communications
|
|
As you have read here and elsewhere, companies are
beginning to offer IPv6 transition services to help
an enterprise determine how to best exploit the capabilities
of IPv6. In many cases, this work will outline the
steps to take to integrate IPv6 into an existing corporate
network running IPv4. NTT Communications is also offering
an IPv6 transition service, but our capabilities center
on our specific expertise in integrating IPv6 on an
existing wide-area network. We do this because that
is the locus of our practical experience.
Every day, we are operating one of the world's
largest commercial IPv6 networks and we know from
actual real-world experience the specific details
both architecturally and operationally what it takes
to be successful in enhancing an existing network
infrastructure to support both IPv6 and IPv4. We have
been developing this expertise for more than a decade,
and used that to transition our own network worldwide
in 2003.
Our process for bringing IPv6 into an existing network
centers on the same basic principles that many others
are citing in their literature. First, you must be
sure you fully understand the network that is operational
today. That includes an inventory of the hardware
and software that make up the network, but it also
includes the current configuration of the hardware
and software and the principles used in operating
that network. These include change management as well
as troubleshooting management. Once there is a thorough
understanding of what exists, it is important to use
that as a basis for determining what the new network
(with IPv6) will be. Here you make decisions about
architecture (e.g. dual-stack vs. overlaying IPv6
on the existing network) and any additional operational
changes (e.g. monitoring the network via IPv6 instead
of IPv4) that are relevant.
READ
ENTIRE ARTICLE
|
|
Case Study: Global Crossing
A Provider's Path for Migrating to IPv6 and Offering
it to the End User
By Alan Rosenberg
Global VP, Business Development
Global Crossing, Inc
|
|
In the early 1990s, the IETF recognized that IPv4
was not ideally suited for the demands of the developing
Internet. The explosive growth of Internet traffic
posed several challenges: There was insufficient address
space [aka poor regional distribution] and over 70%
of the available addresses were assigned to North
America. The packet header structure was too complex
in that a higher number of fields required significant
router processing. Address space concerns, roaming
authentication concerns and the basic lack of protocol-inherent
security capabilities all represented challenges resulting
from the increasing demand for mobile IP.
Additionally, natural market evolution suggested
an impending change in Protocol — more scalable
addressing and routing solutions were needed to meet
Internet growth demands. Increased Internet structure
complexity, due to NATs and gateways, were challenging
customers and service providers, alike. The proliferation
of fixed and portable IP-enabled devices like laptop
PCs, mobile phones, PDAs, consumer appliances, as
well as military applications and surveillance equipment,
were adding to the complexity.
The thinking of the day was that a sooner transition
to IPv6, rather than later, would ensure a new Internet
Protocol introduction that was still manageable and
capable of sustaining current Internet requirements.
READ
ENTIRE ARTICLE
|
The EU Expert Conference on IPv6
in Vienna, 2006
By
Christopher Harz
VP, IPv6 Summit, Inc.
|
|
The recent European Union (EU) Expert Conference
on IPv6, titled, Convergence: New Opportunities
for Accelerating the IPv6 Momentum,
was held in Vienna, at the headquarters of Telekom
Austria, one of the stalwart supporters of v6 in Europe.
The event was well organized, had some really great
speakers, and was an eye opener in more ways than
one. The following is a sample of some experiences
from the conference.
Ulf Dahlsten, a Director of the European Commission
(EC), started the conference with a quick overview,
noting that the uptake of IPv6 in Europe has been
slower than in other parts of the world (i.e., Asia).
He noted that the EC has supported 14 large-scale
research projects in the past few years (for over
170 million euros), and that IPv6 at the network level
is now a mature technology. Reading between the lines,
it would appear that the Commission is satisfied that
it has completed its support of the R&D sector
for IPv6, and would now like to see the technology
proceed beyond primarily academic networks into the
European mainstream. One could imply (note the word
"accelerating" in the event title) that
the EC would like to see this transition speed up
somewhat.
Mr. Dahlsten's thoughts were echoed by Rudolf
Strohmeier, the Head of the Reding Cabinet of the
EC. He noted that the EC had conducted a study of
both the drivers (he called them "triggers")
and blocking factors affecting v6 in Europe. The three
most desirable drivers were: transparency, convergence
and mobility (that can be enabled by IPv6). He mentioned
that IPv6 would restore E2E (End to End) connectivity,
a vital feature of the original Internet. The opportunity
of v6 was thus clearly recognized by the IT leaders
that were surveyed. However, the study showed that
three blocking factors form a chasm that must be crossed
first, a vicious circle of: Lack of Demand, Lack of
Services and Lack of Applications. These feed on each
other, so that no applications results in no demand,
which in turn leads to ISPs not providing v6 services,
which leads to no applications, et cetera. Mr. Strohmeier
added that survey respondents felt that there could
be tremendous growth in four to five years, but that
only new applications afforded by IPv6 would "make
or break" widespread adoption in Europe.
READ
ENTIRE ARTICLE
|
v6 Transition Now Offers IPv6
Transition Services
|
|
IPv6 Summit, Inc., organizer of the US IPv6 Summits
for the last three years and publishers of 6Sense,
now offers a wide range of training, consulting and
implementation support services to make the transition
to IPv6 a reality for your organization. We have assembled
a team of IPv6 experts and partners into v6 Transition,
providing a complete set of solutions to your meet
your IPv6 transition planning and implementation requirements.
MORE
INFO
|
|
|